v2 Report - Additional Information Supplement

KCE King Country Energy Limited

 

 

IPOs and Investment Opportunities

Press releases

25 May 2007

TAKEOVER OFFER FROM TODD ENERGY LIMITED – UPDATE

The Todd Energy partial takeover offer for 14.72% of the shares in King Country Energy is scheduled to close on 8 June 2007. Todd Energy requires acceptances for 2,760,704 shares for the offer to succeed. To date, it has received acceptances for 462,961 shares, representing a substantial shortfall to the level required.

The Independent Directors reiterate their recommendation that shareholders DO NOT ACCEPT the offer for the reasons previously outlined, namely:

• the offer price is too low and an inadequate premium is being offered to compensate you for passing control to Todd Energy;

• if control passes to Todd Energy, no further takeover premium may be available to shareholders; and

• the offer is not a full takeover offer, and accepting shareholders may be left with small, unmarketable parcels of King Country Energy shares with a lower value.

The Independent Directors have been advised that the King Country Electric Power Trust has purchased the Waitomo Energy Consumer Trust’s 8% shareholding in the company and is prepared to purchase additional shares on a first-come-first-served basis at $5.00 per share, for up to 2% of the total shares on issue.

King Country Energy shareholders who have already accepted the offer are now locked in until 8 June 2007. They may not withdraw their acceptances (unless Todd Energy defaults under the offer). Shareholders will not be paid unless and until the offer is unconditional and the extent of any required scaling becomes clear. As accepting shareholders cannot withdraw their acceptances, they are prevented from dealing with their shares in the meantime (including in respect of any offer from the King Country Electric Power Trust).

The Independent Committee advises shareholders NOT TO ACCEPT the Todd Energy offer.

Yours sincerely

KING COUNTRY ENERGY LIMITED

AJ PALMER

Chairman

 

Media Release 18.06.07

Another strong year for King Country Energy

The Board of King Country Energy today announced a fully imputed dividend of 12 cents per share. Together with the interim dividend of 12 cents per share (also fully imputed) the result provides shareholders with a gross annual return of some 36 cents per share or 7.5% based on the share price of $4.80 at the end of March 2007.

The dividend represents 96% of King Country Energy Group’s audited full year Net Profit After Tax (NPAT) of $4.67 million for the year ended 31 March 2007. The result is well ahead of budget and builds on the very good half year performance. The record profit (excluding extraordinary items) has been achieved despite writing off $0.96 million of costs associated with the Resource Management Act consent application for the Mokau Hydro scheme.

Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) for the year were $9.12 million – also ahead of forecast. “The very favourable weather and generation conditions experienced in the first half of the year did not continue with generation volumes in the latter part of the year falling well below forecast due to low rainfall in the King Country,” advised Tony Palmer, Chairman of the King Country Energy Board.

”The company was able to obtain a significant sales volume increase from new out of area contract customers and this has helped to provide a good second half performance. Mr Palmer advised that “a significant amount of Board and management effort was being invested in the Environment Court hearing for the Mokau Hydro scheme.”

He noted that “a number of objectors to the first application are likely to now support the proposed scheme in the Environment Court giving the Board greater confidence the appeal will succeed. The company is also actively looking at a promising wind farm proposal in keeping with its emphasis on operating renewable generation.”

“Given the prospect of significant capital construction early in the new calendar year Directors felt it prudent to hold the dividend at last year’s level”, said Mr Palmer. “The return of the dividend to the substantial shareholding base in the King Country together with the Company’s investment in communities within its service area means the company remains an important part of community wellbeing,” stated Mr Palmer.

Mr Palmer said “the Directors were optimistic that a consented Mokau Hydro scheme would bring further economic and social benefits particularly to the northern supply area.

“The Board is very pleased with the performance of the Company in the 2006/07 year and expects to build on this to deliver increased profit results and returns to shareholders into the coming year,” confirmed Mr Palmer.

Subject to ratification at the King Country Energy Annual General Meeting, the dividend is due to be paid on 7 August 2007 with the Record Date being 30 July 2007. The King Country Energy Annual General Meeting will be held at The Little Theatre on Miriama Street in Taumarunui, at 1:30pm on 26 July.

ENDS

For further information, please call: Kit Wilson, General Manager Tel: (07) 896-0135 or King Country

Energy 0800 523 637

 

Chairman's report

Overview of results

The King Country Energy Group achieved an audited net profit after tax (NPAT) of $4.67 million for the year ended 31 March 2007. This equates to a return of 6.9% on opening shareholder’s funds. The result is ahead of budget and includes the write off of $0.95 million of expenses for the Mokau project.

Earnings before interest, tax depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) for the year was $9.12 million which is an increase of $1.40 million on the $7.72 million recorded last year and ahead of our forecasts after allowing for the Mokau write off. This financial year began with high wholesale electricity prices and low levels and inflows in the South Island lakes but prices dropped from mid year as inflows increased and were very low in the autumn/summer period.

The graph below shows the historic North Island wholesale electricity prices.

Sales volumes have increased 8% during the year as a consequence of growth in sales to existing customers and by the addition of a number of out of area contract customers, acquired through competitive tenders. This business has been won without compromise to our margins. A very good ski season has helped our results and the continued development of facilities on Mt Ruapehu hold the promise of improved sales during future winters.

Above average local generation volumes (+11.5%) and favourable hedge cover has allowed the company to service the growth in demand in electricity at an acceptable cost. Some growth in margin occurred when prices were adjusted for a small band of customers during the year. These adjustments

“The steady progress of our company over the past four years can only be attributed to the ongoing development of our staff whose commitment to service for our customers and community is deeply appreciated”

were made to reflect differences in the cost to supply. Margin growth has come from increased volumes and holding overhead and customer servicing costs.

The result for the year has been affected by the write off of the costs associated with the unsuccessful application for resource consents for the proposed Mokau hydro scheme. These costs are considerable as they include not only our costs but also the costs of the district and regional councils.

Costs of this magnitude have a disproportionate impact on smaller projects making large high impact projects where the potential rewards are great the most likely to be taken through the consent process. Cash flow for the year has been strong and the company has maintained a debt free position while paying tax and fully imputed dividends. The company is very well placed to fund the construction of new generation projects once consents have been obtained.

 

Competitive Market

Nationally, rainfall in the main storage catchments increased in April/May and then stayed at slightly below average levels until November/December when there was a further increase in rainfall. A comparison of lake storage levels for 2006 against historic lake levels is depicted below. As a result of this lake storage situation, the average wholesale electricity price at the North Island reference node (Haywards) was down at $59.91/ MWh for the financial year compared to $89.92/MWh for last year.

To counteract the hydro variability King Country Energy purchases electricity hedges, which effectively fix the price of electricity purchases, to manage the risk of the volatility of wholesale electricity prices. Electricity hedges are purchased from other electricity market participants and the liquidity of the current hedge market in New Zealand continues to be a concern although King Country Energy has always been able to secure sufficient cover.

The Electricity Commission appointed a Hedge Market Development Steering

Group in 2004 who reported back in July 2006 with a number of recommendations. These were open to submission until late October 2006.

Their key initiatives included;

• Compulsory web-based publication of key terms and conditions in contracts over a minimum quantity.

• Requesting EnergyHedge to further develop its services.

• Hedge AC transmission costs by changing allocation of loss and constraint rentals.

• Model master agreement for purchase and sale of financial contracts relating to electricity.

• The commission promoting greater understanding of planned outage and fuel stock information.

• A regular survey of participants to ensure that improvements are on track.

We believe that these initiatives are generally positive but the rate of development appears to be very slow. One potentially significant event was the announcement by ANZ Bank that they intended to join EnergyHedge and trade on that facility for other market participants. Despite the ongoing difficult hedge market conditions, King Country Energy has continued to acquire adequate hedge cover, through bi-lateral negotiations with other market participants. This allows King Country Energy to cover our expected exposure to the wholesale electricity market under dry-year conditions, when we expect lower output from our hydro based generation.

 

Regulatory Issues

Regulatory problems continue to plague the industry in many guises. King Country Energy has been impacted signifi cantly by the Resource Management Act (RMA) in its application for consents to build a new hydroelectric power scheme on the Mokau River. This application was notified by the councils in March 2005 and a prehearing meeting was held in June 2005. Following a plethora of requests for additional information being made by the Regional Council the hearing was finally scheduled for August 2006. Environment Waikato (EW) appointed three councillors to hear our application.

In our renewal of existing consents (and for Mighty River Power) they appointed an experienced Commissioner to support councillors and ensure due process. King Country Energy believes that this would have been a fairer process for our Mokau hearing. We are now awaiting the date for the appeal hearing in the Environment Court which is expected in September. The costs of these delays are very signifi cant with the impact of excessive time delays increasing capital costs and incurring replacement hedging costs to off set the lost generation.

TrustPower in their media release of the financial results also commented on these RMA issues. In particular “The 2004 and 2005 amendments to the

Resource Management Act have been ineffective. Barriers which presently exist within the RMA consenting process need to be removed.” King Country Energy supports the position that TrustPower has taken. The Electricity Commission continues to be active across a broad, and growing, front.

While the staff and the working groups aim to be fair we still believe that there is an inherent bias that appears in a number of its recommendations. The large industry players have wide representation on the Electricity Commission’s working groups and are of great assistance; however, their preference is for nationwide standards that make it hard for

“Despite the ongoing difficult hedge market conditions, King Country Energy has continued to acquire adequate hedge cover, through bi-lateral negotiations with other market participants”

smaller players and new entrants to create a niche in which they can compete effectively and thus, the impact does not promote competition. One example of this is in the Government desire for all industry participants to be members of an “approved complaints scheme”. King Country Energy has worked with the King Country Electric Power Trust to create a locally based scheme that is relevant to our consumers and have submitted it for approval.

The Electricity Commission finally put out a discussion paper and consultation request on whether they should approve multiple schemes. This issue has been on the table for over two years now without a decision and there are three independent schemes operating in competition with the Government monolith the Electricity and Gas Complaints Commission. These three cover King Country Energy, BoPE and TrustPower.

The Electricity Commission is also undertaking a review of the operation of the wholesale electricity market which is scheduled for completion by the end of 2007. Also the Commerce Commission began a review of the market behaviour of generator/retailers in early 2006. This has no published completion time frame. These reviews add to the uncertainty that is endemic within the electricity sector.

 

Generation

Total generation from our own plant amounted to 143.8GWh for the year

(66.9GWh from our local sites and 76.9GWh from our half of Mangahao Hydro Station), which was well ahead of our budget of 128.9GWh largely due to the fortuitous rainfall conditions in our local area when the South Island lakes were low. The generation income was lower than budget because of the significant dropping in average price to $59.91/MWh from $89.92/MWh last year.

The renewal of our Mokauiti station consent has finally been completed with the written decision signed off by the Court in April 2007, a period of six years since the original hearing and ten years from the original application. These delays are very costly because of the consultant time involved but are not as critical for a consent renewal as we are still operating.

As previously reported the saga of our application to create a dam on the

Mokau River is still continuing. We are hopeful that the Environment Court appeal will resolve the issue favourably in September 2007. This proposal would add an annual average 44GWh to our generation which is about 20% of our current requirement. The excellent result from Mangahao this year has been enhanced by the output of the Mini hydro which is making a steady contribution to our generation. The first full year of generation from the Mangahao mini hydro unit contributed 4.8GWh to our share.

 

Retail

Retail sales for the year were above our budget (223GWh) at 239GWh with good growth in domestic and contract volume throughout the year. This was enhanced by the long ski season that bolstered sales around the mountain in the first half of the financial year. Our position as a niche player in the market

 

FINANCIAL CALENDAR

Final dividend announced 8 June 2007

Annual General Meeting 7 August 2007

Final dividend record date 10 August 2007

Final dividend payment 17 August 2007

Half-year results November 2007

Interim dividend paid December 2007

 

has reinforced our reputation as a dependable and trustworthy service provider. The above budget growth has shown the demand for our service. Our customer services team continues to provide excellent service to our customers and management continually works to further improve efficiencies and streamline meter reading, billing and call centre processes. The Lines Company (TLC) continued to experience difficulties with their billing operation through out the financial year and this caused many problems for our customers and staff.

People

The steady progress of our company over the past four years can only be attributed to the ongoing development of our staff whose commitment to service for our customers and community is deeply appreciated. The team is working together in ways which ensure that they deliver best in class service.

 

Governance

The Board has confidence in the operation of the Corporate Governance framework that has been set up to monitor the management of the Group and compliance with all statutory obligations. The monthly Finance and Audit Committee meetings and informative monthly Board reporting maintains this confidence level.

Your Directors are seeking an increase in the amount available to be disbursed as Directors’ fees. It has been four years since there was an increase in the size of the pool from which fees are paid. Directors believe an increase in the size of the pool is necessary to accommodate the appointment of a further director if that is found necessary, to allow additional fees to be paid when significant unforeseen work, such as has been required by recent takeover activity is required of directors and to recognise the significant improvement in the earnings and dividends achieved in recent years. It does not automatically follow that individual directors will benefit from an increase in the size of the fee allocation.

 

Dividends

The Board’s policy is to return not less than 60% of NPAT to shareholders.

Over recent years we have returned well above this minimum. The Board proposes to pay a fully imputed (tax paid) final dividend of 12 cents per share (which is equivalent to a gross taxable dividend of 17.9 cents per share). The interim and final dividend represent 96% of NPAT. Together with the interim dividend of 12 cents per share (fully imputed) this will provide shareholders with a gross return of 35.8 cents per share or 7.5% based on the share price of $4.80 at the end of March 2007.

“Our customer service team continues to provide excellent service to our customers”

 

Share Price

This year the share price moved between $3.70 and $4.30 until December when Todd Energy made their first offer of $4.40 per share for all the shares in the company. This offer was not successful and a second offer of $5.00 per share to take their holding to 50.1% was lodged in March. This activity took the share price to a high of $5.00 per share and the year ended with the price at $4.80 per share.

The attached graph shows the King Country Energy share price history since inception. The Board has continued to allow the Company’s shares to be traded on the Unlisted market. The performance of this trading platform is under continuing assessment in comparison with the NZAX and the NZX exchanges.

The Board regularly reviews the market information and aims to ensure that shareholders are not disadvantaged.

 

Outlook

The Board is very satisfied with the performance of the Company in the 2007 year and expects to grow from this base in the coming years and provide similar levels of return to shareholders. We expect to deliver an NPAT similar to the 2007 year. The benefits of increasing sales are likely to be off set by a return to more normal generation patterns.

 

Thank you

Once again the Directors would like to express their appreciation for the support and efforts of the King Country Energy team. We are proud of our people and their performance. I would also like to thank our customers for their loyalty and support.

 

Tony Palmer

Chairman

 

 

Director's Report

MANAGER REPORT

 

Weather conditions have been interesting this year with low South Island lake inflows and levels and high prices initially while we had good generation in our own stations. In May 2006 the water levels began to rise and prices fell to average levels while we had good early snowfalls on the mountain creating a long ski season. Then in late autumn the rains came with a vengeance to the catchments of the main hydro storage lakes and electricity market prices fell well below average. The average price for the year was below average ($59.91/MWh at Haywards) and our generation was well above budget at both Mangahao and our local stations.

 

Retail Operations

Over the year, we grew our retail customer sales significantly ahead of our budget targets. The focus of this growth has been in providing professional and personal service to customers in our local area and in the central North Island. King Country Energy has positioned itself as a niche player in the market and our service levels distinguish it from other participants. While we continue to pride ourselves on service there remain in the market large numbers of customers who will select an energy supplier on price alone.

During the year King Country Energy has been able to secure a number of such customers without compromising its margins showing that its relative lack of size in the market is no barrier to gaining new customers. During the year King Country Energy made a promise to its domestic customers that it would hold it prices until at least the end of March 2008. This means domestic customers will not receive a price increase for a period of at least 30 months despite a generally rising trend in wholesale prices.

Adjustments were made to the prices of contract, commercial and farming customers as the last step in a phased programme to remove pricing anomalies. Pricing to all customers now fairly reflects their cost of supply. Despite this increase our prices to these customers remain very competitive and virtually no customers were lost. We further refined our market support operational structure during the year and our customer service team has continued to improve performance in all aspects of customer service as measured by an independent research organisation. The graph below shows the consistent improvement in customer satisfaction over the past four years.

 “During the year King Country Energy made a promise to its domestic customers that it would hold it prices until at least the end of March 2008”

Our call centre continues to receive numerous calls from our customers seeking our assistance with resolving the problems they are having with their network charges bills received from The Lines Company. We believe these calls to be recognition from our customers of our ability to politely and promptly solve their problems. Unfortunately we have not been able to render the assistance customers have sought. We have also suffered from the very same billing problems and struggled just as hard to get them resolved.

 

Wholesale Trading

We have continued to purchase hedges from other market participants to cover our expected exposure to the wholesale electricity market costs under dry year conditions. To ensure that we are able to give ourselves the most opportune time to select the most appropriately priced hedge cover, we aim to purchase our hedges one to two years ahead of requirements. The hedge market remains undeveloped with generators appearing to treat hedges as a fixed price, fixed volume supply contracts rather than a financial instrument.

This makes it difficult to balance hedge cover and electricity demand over a year. Although the excess hedge can limit our returns when prices are low, as in the latter part of the financial year, the risk when prices are high and our generation low is much higher and must be covered. The financial return achieved in this past year again demonstrated the efficacy of our strategy.

King Country Energy is pleased to report that we receive a good response to our requests for hedge coverage from almost all participants in the electricity market. It would appear that the market recognises we are a serious and trustworthy participant who will be here for the long term. With our improved internal processes we are able to monitor our supply and demand balance closely and ensure that any imbalance between growing demand and hedge cover can be dealt with promptly.

 

Generation

Overall generation from our local stations and half share of the Mangahao station was 11.6% ahead of budget, with Mangahao up 11.9% and the local stations up 11.1%. This was largely due to favourable rainfall patterns but also to the first full year of the mini hydro at Mangahao. Of more importance was the timing of the rainfall. The periods of high rainfall have coincided periods of high prices while dry periods and low spot prices have coincided. As a result the financial impact of own generation this year has been significantly greater than would be normal.

Major works maintenance this year included the installation of a tipping gate at Wairere as part of our Resource Consent conditions and renewing the main seal on the #1 generator at Mangahao. Both of these works went to plan although the guide vanes for Mangahao G1 were found to be significantly worn and will have to be replaced early in the 07/08 year. The new online blade adjustment facility at Piriaka is being specifically engineered for purpose. The unique approach to resolving technical issues has not been without its problems, but these are being addressed.

With the cost of new generation and the uncertainty of resource consent applications we will continue to ensure that the equipment in our older hydro stations is updated to take advantage of new technologies that will improve generation efficiencies. Mokauiti station consent has finally been received from the Environment Court some six years after the initial hearing. The delays while not as expensive as for a new application are still significant due to the need to keep consultants on the payroll to check on progress.

This will require the installation of a tipping gate next summer and further work on alternative fish passage options both up and down stream. The proposed hydro scheme on the Mokau River went to a hearing by Environment Waikato (EW) and Waitomo District Council (WDC) in August. Rather than use an expert commissioner experienced in hearing complex planning applications EW chose to appoint three councillors to the panel. This was particularly disappointing as EW had appointed a commissioner to head the renewal consent application for Wairere and Mokauiti.

Our analysis of the rejection of the application indicated that the decision was based upon loss of amenity to a small number of infrequent users of the gorge to be flooded by the proposed lake. Many of those users are not locals and bring no economic benefit to local communities. No weight appeared to be given to the economic benefit that would flow to the local community or the recreational benefit that the community would gain from access to a significant body of flat water. Their decision has been appealed to the Environment Court with a hearing expected in September.

 

Community

King Country Energy has continued to support community initiatives that benefit everyone in the region. We are delighted with the growth of King Country Energy KiwiCan in the southern region and many other similar projects throughout the whole community. We are also very happy with the Customer Complaints Scheme launched in conjunction with the King Country Electric Power Trust. This initiative means that any customer of King Country Energy who can not sort out their issue with the company directly has a convenient local option that will address issues at no cost to the consumer. We believe that this is far preferable to the Government megalith based in Wellington.

 

Kit Wilson

General Manager

 

 

Investment Centre
enquire about sponsorship and advertising: info@smallcaps.co.nz   

References:
Annual reports 
Price info provided by Findata

Back to unlisted.smallcaps.co.nz

Copyright © 2007 Small Cap Research Limited. All rights reserved.

Disclosure of Interest: Directors and/or staff of Small Cap Research Limited may have an interest in securities mentioned in this document. Small Cap Research Limited, its employees and agents believe that the information herein is correct at the time of compilation, however they do not warrant the accuracy of that information. Save for any statutory liability which cannot be excluded Small Cap Research Limited further disclaim all responsibility or liability for any loss or damage including consequential loss or damage which may be suffered by any person relying upon such information or any opinion, conclusions, or recommendations herein whether that loss or damage is caused by any fault or negligence on the part of Small Cap Research Limited or otherwise. This disclaimer extends to any entity that may distribute this publication and in which Small Cap Research Limited have an interest.
Notice:
This document contains general securities advice only, In preparing this document, Small Cap Research Limited did not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs ('financial circumstances') of any particular person. Accordingly, before acting on any advice contained in this document, you should assess whether the advice is appropriate in light of your own financial circumstances or contact your financial adviser.